OVERVIEW
READINGS
PRESENTATION

 
EDP 5285-01
GROUP PROCESSES
COURSE PAPER
SPRING 2018

 
GENERAL INFORMATION 

 
WRITING
TIPS
INITIAL
INFORMATION
TIME GUIDELINES & 
OTHER INFORMATION
PRIOR
EXAMPLES

 
YES, TIME CAN FLY!

  Due February 8 to our DISCUSSION BOARD: Milestone 1 
(click "milestone 1" to see this section!)
DUE MAY 2 (by noon): FINAL PROJECT: FIXED DEADLINE!
DUE MARCH 22: INITIAL PROJECT DRAFT 
Both the first ("rough") and final drafts are submitted through turnitin on our Blackboard Assignments Folder
MEANWHILE REVIEW "THE GOOD PAPER" SITE HERE
UNLESS CLASS TEAMWORK, PROJECTS ARE 15 PAGES (12 font double spaced or the equivalent)


REMEMBER! Will you collect data for your Groups Project?

Here's the site for FSU's Human Subjects Committee (Institutional Review Board or IRB).

YOU are not the one to decide if your project is exempt from IRB approval--that's what IRBs are for.
In  my experience on this committee, everyone believes that they are exempt! That's a technical term. I saw projects that would curl your hair and almost certainly would have been harmful had they not been revised.
My favorite was the historian who said "we don't need Human Subjects Approval: everyone we study is DEAD."
But (a) that is not always true and (b) the subjects of study have descendents and even surviving friends who care about them.

The IRB can take a month or more to approve a project.



  DUE FEBRUARY 8 (11:59 pm):
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS

Here's what you need to tell me:

EXAMPLES: Instructional design; teacher expectations; sports teams; work groups; business innovations EXAMPLES:an ethnography of relative influence among team players and coaches in discretionary spending on the road; an analytic plan of how familial attachment influences planned college achievement; an observational study (cohesion in religious congregations); an experiment (I will manipulate aspects of bureaucracy and measure work group effectiveness); an archival study (the rise and fall of a national fraternity) EXAMPLE: I will use an observational design to study leadership styles in private profit seeking and non-profit organizations. I plan to use two organizations and am currently discussing this project with the organizational administration.

EXAMPLE: I will conduct a literature review on the effects of group versus individual learning styles in algebra achievement. I am reading journals in both group dynamics and math education.

EXPECTED PROPECTUS LENGTH: 1-3 double-spaced typed pages or equivalent. (Obviously somewhat more detailed than my examples!)

DON'T: be too specific. I don't need to know your exact journals, books, coding categories, any standardized tests or minute experimental manipulations. That information will be on the MARCH 8 update.



When you look at feedback on your précis from February 8, you might see just a variation of "OK, go ahead."  I check to make sure that your project reflects course material in some form. If in doubt about these terms, review Guide 1 and/or we can discuss your project further. I may have noted that I need to learn more about what you actually will do in your project. I may have jotted down some references for you that I think are relevant. I also try to estimate whether you have enough for approximately a 15 page paper, way too much or "just right". Don't worry about any underlining or tracking; that's to help my vision and keep my eyes focused on the page!

HERE'S WHAT I WILL NEED FOR THE March 8 UPDATE

Since each person has a unique topic and project, it's difficult to give a set of generalized instructions for the project update that "fits" everyone. Just recall that the true purpose of this update is to keep everyone on task!

If you meet the milestones set at intervals throughout the semester, you are virtually certain to submit your first draft on time (March 22) and then you will be able to revise it, if you so choose, for the final deadline (May 2 at noon).

This is now the time to set down the exact journals, books, coding categories, any standardized tests or minute experimental manipulations that you plan to use, review, or to read.

So, keeping these individualized caveats in mind, here's what you need to tell me by March 8:

(1) What is it that you are going to do? Literature review? Empirical study? WHAT KIND of empirical study? A brief--but cogent--review and a study design?

(2) What is your topic?  BE SPECIFIC!  At this point, you are involved in a subtopic (you need to include it again, and if you have changed it, now is the time to describe it!) For example, if you are studying group cohesion, that is a gigantic literature. What subfield are you examining (e.g., how sports teams coordinate their actions or how cohesion influences work performance.)?

(3) Do you have team members? If you are working with someone else in our class, now is the time to tell me who, if you haven't already.

(4A) IF YOU ARE DOING AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OR DESIGNING AN EMPIRICAL STUDY: This is the time for me to see your procedures, see your questionnaire (if appropriate), star the variables you plan to analyze, review your field observation codes, etc. (And the Human Subjects Committee can take several weeks so please keep that in mind if you plan Human Subjects approval. If you would like your measures put into action at a future date, now is probably the time to explore Human Subjects (IRB) approval.)

(4B) IF YOU ARE DOING A LITERATURE REVIEW: Now is the time to describe some of the journals, the books, the sites, the other people or literature that you are investigating. Give me a topical outline of the areas that you will review. If you must interpolate from a related literature (e.g., from individual emotional intelligence to emotional intelligence in groups), describe that parent area.

IT WILL BE HELPFUL TO YOU AND TO ME: if possible, give me a total outline of your project as you envision it. Delineate the subareas clearly.

Coming after March 8, more writing tips.
 

POSSIBILITIES

Here are some possibilities for your project:

Research existing literature in an area of interest to you.

Analyze or reanalyze existing data.

Design a study to be carried out in the future.

Complete a small original study such as an experiment, survey, or observation.

TIME GUIDELINES

A short preliminary prospectus of your Course Paper is due FEBRUARY 8.

An updated prospectus of your course paper is due MARCH  8.

A initial draft of your Course Paper is due by MARCH 22 to allow you to revise it.

The final edition of your paper is due Wednesday May 2 by NOON. This deadline is FIRM.
 


 
ON TEAMWORK

Teams find it easier than individuals to plan and execute a small experiment, survey, or observation. You may choose to work in teams for the Course Paper.  Please turn in the names of all team members on the Course Paper by February 8 with the preliminary prospectus. I also will alert you to possible teammates (but the choice is yours).


LENGTH

While there will be individual differences, the typical Course Paper is about 15 pages, including tables, figures, illustrations, and references. Team papers are typically 20-25 pages.



PAST EXAMPLES

TOPICS FROM PRIOR YEARS:
 

Bullying and group processes
Fandom
Classroom "personality" and class achievement
Cooperative learning (e.g., among Chinese students; in middle school classrooms; in collaborative concept mapping)
Cohesion in different groups (e.g., sports teams, youth gangs)
Collective efficacy and group performance
Deliberations in mock juries
Ethnography (e.g., the FSU Jewish Student Union; a local religious congregation; the FSU Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender Student Union)
Focus groups on diverse topics (e.g., student drinking; leadership on campus)
Fostering cooperation among students in online environments
Comparing international vs USA students on desired interactions
Group factors in learning self-assisted technology (i.e., learning to check out your own groceries)
Group interaction and second language acquisition
How families help children cope with trauma (also with student achievement)
How preschool teachers interact with girls and boys
Interpersonal processes in African-American churches
Media effects and science 
Online learning and interaction
Reference groups and individual outcomes
Shared mental mapping (e.g., in sports groups)
Social loafing in work groups
Student on student victimization in the schools
Team management in the service industry

Also, check out our Canvas site for examples; explore Presentations under Modules.
 
 



 
PLANNING TO GATHER YOUR OWN DATA?

If you plan to conduct a survey, an experiment, observations for your course paper and you also plan to use the data later (e.g., for a thesis, dissertation, conference paper, article), your project may need approval from FSU's Human Subjects Committee (also known as the Institutional Review Board or IRB). Plan early if so! A phone call or an email is often sufficient for the Committee Administrator to tell you if you need to make an application. More information and Human Subjects forms are online.

FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE INFORMATION CLICK HERE


All students will do a class presentation based on their paper topic.

We will also periodically discuss the topics chosen for the course paper.


If you have problems with spelling, use a spell checker. They are wonderful. Be sure that nouns and verbs agree with respect to singular/plural status and time tense. I suggest that you have a friend or colleague proof read your paper. I have had mixed luck with word processor grammar checks but the spell checkers work well in virtually all word processors. Problems with spelling and grammar (or, conversely, an impeccable paper) can influence your grade up to one-half grade (e.g., from a B+ to an A-). I basically follow the American Psychological Association's basic guidelines on citations within text and bibliographic references.

Within the text, identify your reference: use the author(s)' last name(s) and the year of publication, enclosed in parentheses. If there are two different authors with the same last name, add a first initial. If an author has two cited works the same year, distinguish them by "a" and "b".

For the last 25 years or so, APA style does NOT distinguish by the gender of the author. BOTH male and female authors are designated by initials, not their first names (the old practice of only using first names for female authors functioned more like a red flag than a courtesy and the APA dropped this decades ago.)

For example, you have two authors with the surname of Jones, Arlene Jones and Jerry Jones. Arlene Jones published two articles in 1999 and you want to cite them both. Here's my brief example with citations:

As Arlene Jones reported in two separate studies (A. Jones, 1999a; 1999b), sociable dogs run in packs. However, Jerry Jones (J. Jones, 2003) has reported that this is not true for "Alpha dogs."
In terms of references: they are placed at the back of your paper in a separate bibliographic section (APA style is to reserve footnotes ONLY for substantive asides, and NOT for references). I am a bit less fussy about the order in which you place reference information, but all the following should be present: author(s)' last name(s) and first initial; date of resource; full title of resource; location of resource (i.e., book; journal; Internet); pagination, if appropriate. If book, give year of publication, publisher and publisher's main city. If journal, full journal title must also be included, volume and issue number (usually on table of contents page of journal), and pagination.

The basic idea is that if someone reads your paper and wants to read any of your references, the complete information should be given to enable your reader to easily do so.



 
OVERVIEW
READINGS
PRESENTATION

This page was built with Netscape Composer.
Susan Carol Losh
January 1 2018