|
|
|
GROUP PROCESSES COURSE PAPER SPRING 2018 |
|
|
TIPS |
INFORMATION |
OTHER INFORMATION |
EXAMPLES |
Due February 8 to our DISCUSSION BOARD: Milestone
1
|
REMEMBER!
Will
you collect data for your Groups Project?
Here's the site for FSU's Human Subjects Committee (Institutional Review Board or IRB).
YOU are not the one to decide if your
project is exempt from IRB approval--that's what IRBs are for.
In my experience on this committee,
everyone
believes that they are exempt! That's a technical term. I saw projects
that would curl your hair and almost certainly would have been harmful
had they not been revised.
My favorite was the historian who said
"we don't need Human Subjects Approval: everyone we study is DEAD."
But (a) that is not always true and (b)
the subjects of study have descendents and even surviving friends who care
about them.
The IRB can take a month or more to approve a project.
PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS |
Here's what you need to tell me:
EXAMPLE: I will conduct a literature review on the effects of group versus individual learning styles in algebra achievement. I am reading journals in both group dynamics and math education.
EXPECTED PROPECTUS LENGTH: 1-3 double-spaced typed pages or equivalent. (Obviously somewhat more detailed than my examples!)
DON'T: be too specific. I don't need to know your exact journals, books, coding categories, any standardized tests or minute experimental manipulations. That information will be on the MARCH 8 update.
|
Since each person has a unique topic and project, it's difficult to give a set of generalized instructions for the project update that "fits" everyone. Just recall that the true purpose of this update is to keep everyone on task!
If you meet the milestones set at intervals throughout the semester, you are virtually certain to submit your first draft on time (March 22) and then you will be able to revise it, if you so choose, for the final deadline (May 2 at noon).
This is now the time to set down the exact journals, books, coding categories, any standardized tests or minute experimental manipulations that you plan to use, review, or to read.
So, keeping these individualized caveats in mind, here's what you need to tell me by March 8:
(1) What is it that you are going to do? Literature review? Empirical study? WHAT KIND of empirical study? A brief--but cogent--review and a study design?
(2) What is your topic? BE SPECIFIC! At this point, you are involved in a subtopic (you need to include it again, and if you have changed it, now is the time to describe it!) For example, if you are studying group cohesion, that is a gigantic literature. What subfield are you examining (e.g., how sports teams coordinate their actions or how cohesion influences work performance.)?
(3) Do you have team members? If you are working with someone else in our class, now is the time to tell me who, if you haven't already.
(4A) IF YOU ARE DOING AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OR DESIGNING AN EMPIRICAL STUDY: This is the time for me to see your procedures, see your questionnaire (if appropriate), star the variables you plan to analyze, review your field observation codes, etc. (And the Human Subjects Committee can take several weeks so please keep that in mind if you plan Human Subjects approval. If you would like your measures put into action at a future date, now is probably the time to explore Human Subjects (IRB) approval.)
(4B) IF YOU ARE DOING A LITERATURE REVIEW: Now is the time to describe some of the journals, the books, the sites, the other people or literature that you are investigating. Give me a topical outline of the areas that you will review. If you must interpolate from a related literature (e.g., from individual emotional intelligence to emotional intelligence in groups), describe that parent area.
IT WILL BE HELPFUL TO YOU AND TO ME: if possible, give me a total outline of your project as you envision it. Delineate the subareas clearly.
Coming after March 8, more writing tips.
|
Here are some possibilities for your project:
Research existing literature in an area of interest to you.
Analyze or reanalyze existing data.
Design a study to be carried out in the future.
Complete a small original study such as an experiment, survey, or observation.
|
A short preliminary prospectus of your Course Paper is due FEBRUARY 8.
An updated prospectus of your course paper is due MARCH 8.
A initial draft of your Course Paper is due by MARCH 22 to allow you to revise it.
The
final edition of your paper is due Wednesday May
2 by NOON. This deadline is FIRM.
|
Teams find it easier than individuals to plan and execute a small experiment, survey, or observation. You may choose to work in teams for the Course Paper. Please turn in the names of all team members on the Course Paper by February 8 with the preliminary prospectus. I also will alert you to possible teammates (but the choice is yours).
|
While there will be individual differences, the typical Course Paper is about 15 pages, including tables, figures, illustrations, and references. Team papers are typically 20-25 pages.
|
TOPICS FROM PRIOR YEARS:
Bullying and group processes |
Fandom |
Classroom "personality" and class achievement |
Cooperative learning (e.g., among Chinese students; in middle school classrooms; in collaborative concept mapping) |
Cohesion in different groups (e.g., sports teams, youth gangs) |
Collective efficacy and group performance |
Deliberations in mock juries |
Ethnography (e.g., the FSU Jewish Student Union; a local religious congregation; the FSU Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender Student Union) |
Focus groups on diverse topics (e.g., student drinking; leadership on campus) |
Fostering cooperation among students in online environments |
Comparing international vs USA students on desired interactions |
Group factors in learning self-assisted technology (i.e., learning to check out your own groceries) |
Group interaction and second language acquisition |
How families help children cope with trauma (also with student achievement) |
How preschool teachers interact with girls and boys |
Interpersonal processes in African-American churches |
Media effects and science |
Online learning and interaction |
Reference groups and individual outcomes |
Shared mental mapping (e.g., in sports groups) |
Social loafing in work groups |
Student on student victimization in the schools |
Team management in the service industry |
Also, check out our Canvas site for
examples; explore Presentations under Modules.
|
If you plan to conduct a survey, an experiment, observations for your course paper and you also plan to use the data later (e.g., for a thesis, dissertation, conference paper, article), your project may need approval from FSU's Human Subjects Committee (also known as the Institutional Review Board or IRB). Plan early if so! A phone call or an email is often sufficient for the Committee Administrator to tell you if you need to make an application. More information and Human Subjects forms are online.
FOR HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE INFORMATION CLICK HERE
All students will do a class presentation based on their paper topic.
We will also periodically discuss the topics chosen for the course paper.
Within the text, identify your reference: use the author(s)' last name(s) and the year of publication, enclosed in parentheses. If there are two different authors with the same last name, add a first initial. If an author has two cited works the same year, distinguish them by "a" and "b".
For the last 25 years or so, APA style does NOT distinguish by the gender of the author. BOTH male and female authors are designated by initials, not their first names (the old practice of only using first names for female authors functioned more like a red flag than a courtesy and the APA dropped this decades ago.)
For example, you have two authors with the surname of Jones, Arlene Jones and Jerry Jones. Arlene Jones published two articles in 1999 and you want to cite them both. Here's my brief example with citations:
As Arlene Jones reported in two separate studies (A. Jones, 1999a; 1999b), sociable dogs run in packs. However, Jerry Jones (J. Jones, 2003) has reported that this is not true for "Alpha dogs."In terms of references: they are placed at the back of your paper in a separate bibliographic section (APA style is to reserve footnotes ONLY for substantive asides, and NOT for references). I am a bit less fussy about the order in which you place reference information, but all the following should be present: author(s)' last name(s) and first initial; date of resource; full title of resource; location of resource (i.e., book; journal; Internet); pagination, if appropriate. If book, give year of publication, publisher and publisher's main city. If journal, full journal title must also be included, volume and issue number (usually on table of contents page of journal), and pagination.
The basic idea is that if someone reads your paper and wants to read any of your references, the complete information should be given to enable your reader to easily do so.
|
|
|
|
This page was built with
Netscape Composer.
Susan Carol Losh
January 1 2018