| Post Draft Analysis | |||||||
| Derek's Draft Analysis | |||||||
| Below are the estimated number of points and final ranking as tallied from Nate Silver's round-specific probabilities of advancement for each team. Note it is very close to the order of draft positions, for whatever that is worth. As I recall, in the past positions 3-6 seem to be the best, so this doesn't bode well for the system. Brian Taylor is the projected winner of Hoops 2013. If I recall, he seems to do well in my projections yet always loses miserably. Not surprising, my own ranking methods rank me high at number 2 (again, I think this is constant across years and I never seem to win - I think won in the second year we ever did this pool, 1988...I feel like La Salle, so maybe this is my year to get back on the winning track). Brian Hall will have to settle for a tie with Piet for 3rd this year. | |||||||
| Nate Silver Projections | |||||||
| 1st | Brian T | 8.6 | |||||
| 2nd | Derek | 8.4 | |||||
| 3rd | Brian H | 7.8 | |||||
| 4th | Piet | 7.8 | |||||
| 5th | Eric | 7.7 | |||||
| 6th | Andrew | 7.6 | |||||
| 7th | Matt | 7.5 | |||||
| 8th | John | 7.3 | |||||
| And for a team by team ranking of the value of each pick, relative to the draft position they were takes, see below. This is also based on the Nate Silver's probabilities. The Gain/Loss column tells you how many points you gained or lost by taking that team relative to the draft position. So it says that Andrew gained 1.19 points by picking Florida in the number 11 draft position (Silver's stats ranks Florida as the 3rd best pick on the Tourney behind Louisville and Indiana. Florida was a much better value than the number 2 value pick, Michigan by Piet, which was worth 0.47 points. The worst pick relative to draft position is judged to be Duke by Brian Hall (the reign of terror ends here!). Miami, UCLA & St. Louis are projected to be pretty crappy picks too. | |||||||
| Team | Who | Draft position | Pick Value | Draft Position Value | Gain/Loss | ||
| Florida | AB | 11 | 3.052 | 1.866 | 1.186 | ||
| Michigan | PS | 14 | 2.044 | 1.572 | 0.472 | ||
| Arizona | AB | 22 | 1.393 | 1.022 | 0.371 | ||
| Davidson | DJ | 50 | 0.581 | 0.318 | 0.263 | ||
| Minnesota | DJ | 34 | 0.862 | 0.6 | 0.262 | ||
| North Carolina State | BT | 32 | 1.014 | 0.783 | 0.231 | ||
| Wisconsin | DJ | 15 | 1.572 | 1.393 | 0.179 | ||
| Bucknell | ER | 44 | 0.59 | 0.415 | 0.175 | ||
| Oklahoma | AB | 43 | 0.6 | 0.431 | 0.169 | ||
| New Mexico State | MD | 55 | 0.318 | 0.155 | 0.163 | ||
| Wichita State | DJ | 47 | 0.512 | 0.359 | 0.153 | ||
| Ohio State | MD | 7 | 2.555 | 2.418 | 0.137 | ||
| Pittsburgh | BH | 29 | 0.984 | 0.862 | 0.122 | ||
| Akron | BH | 52 | 0.359 | 0.251 | 0.108 | ||
| California | PS | 46 | 0.472 | 0.367 | 0.105 | ||
| Missouri | BT | 33 | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.1 | ||
| Valparaiso | ER | 53 | 0.251 | 0.168 | 0.083 | ||
| Oregon | JH | 40 | 0.587 | 0.512 | 0.075 | ||
| Marquette | DJ | 18 | 1.356 | 1.305 | 0.051 | ||
| UNLV | ER | 21 | 1.142 | 1.093 | 0.049 | ||
| Florida Gulf Coast | AB | 58 | 0.14 | 0.128 | 0.012 | ||
| Cincinnati | AB | 38 | 0.586 | 0.581 | 0.005 | ||
| Syracuse | BH | 13 | 1.73 | 1.725 | 0.005 | ||
| Harvard | JH | 56 | 0.155 | 0.151 | 0.004 | ||
| La Salle | AB | 54 | 0.158 | 0.158 | 0 | ||
| Louisville | BT | 1 | 3.678 | 3.678 | 0 | ||
| Indiana | DJ | 2 | 3.556 | 3.556 | 0 | ||
| Gonzaga | ER | 5 | 2.788 | 2.788 | 0 | ||
| Iona | ER | 60 | 0.077 | 0.077 | 0 | ||
| Michigan State | MD | 10 | 1.87 | 1.87 | 0 | ||
| Pacific | JH | 57 | 0.128 | 0.14 | -0.012 | ||
| James Madison | DJ | 63 | 0.009 | 0.021 | -0.012 | ||
| Creighton | JH | 25 | 0.906 | 0.921 | -0.015 | ||
| North Carolina A&T | BT | 64 | 0.003 | 0.02 | -0.017 | ||
| Mississippi | BH | 45 | 0.367 | 0.385 | -0.018 | ||
| Butler | PS | 19 | 1.113 | 1.142 | -0.029 | ||
| Notre Dame | AB | 27 | 0.872 | 0.906 | -0.034 | ||
| Southern University | PS | 62 | 0.02 | 0.066 | -0.046 | ||
| Western Kentucky | BH | 61 | 0.021 | 0.072 | -0.051 | ||
| Colorado | DJ | 31 | 0.75 | 0.802 | -0.052 | ||
| Iowa State | BH | 36 | 0.533 | 0.587 | -0.054 | ||
| Albany | MD | 59 | 0.066 | 0.125 | -0.059 | ||
| Kansas State | BT | 16 | 1.305 | 1.364 | -0.059 | ||
| North Carolina | JH | 24 | 0.911 | 0.984 | -0.073 | ||
| Villanova | MD | 42 | 0.385 | 0.47 | -0.085 | ||
| Illinois | ER | 28 | 0.783 | 0.872 | -0.089 | ||
| Oklahoma State | BH | 20 | 1.022 | 1.113 | -0.091 | ||
| Memphis | MD | 23 | 0.921 | 1.014 | -0.093 | ||
| Colorado State | MD | 39 | 0.431 | 0.533 | -0.102 | ||
| San Diego State | MD | 26 | 0.802 | 0.911 | -0.109 | ||
| Montana | BT | 49 | 0.151 | 0.32 | -0.169 | ||
| Kansas | PS | 3 | 2.881 | 3.052 | -0.171 | ||
| Belmont | ER | 37 | 0.415 | 0.586 | -0.171 | ||
| Northwestern State | PS | 51 | 0.072 | 0.255 | -0.183 | ||
| Saint Mary's | JH | 41 | 0.255 | 0.472 | -0.217 | ||
| South Dakota State | BT | 48 | 0.125 | 0.35 | -0.225 | ||
| Georgetown | JH | 8 | 1.866 | 2.114 | -0.248 | ||
| VCU | BT | 17 | 1.093 | 1.356 | -0.263 | ||
| Temple | PS | 35 | 0.32 | 0.59 | -0.27 | ||
| New Mexico | JH | 9 | 1.725 | 2.044 | -0.319 | ||
| Saint Louis | ER | 12 | 1.364 | 1.73 | -0.366 | ||
| UCLA | PS | 30 | 0.47 | 0.85 | -0.38 | ||
| Miami (FL) | AB | 6 | 2.114 | 2.555 | -0.441 | ||
| Duke | BH | 4 | 2.418 | 2.881 | -0.463 | ||
| Andrew's Draft Analysis | |||||||
| The best average seed is Drum with a 7.88. John is worst with a 9.00 average seed. The best among top four teams are Piet and Eric with 4.25 average seeds. | |||||||
| 1. Andrew - With UF, Miami and Notre Dame, I will be rooting for my team to lose. | |||||||
| 2. Piet - A good lineup, but his finish will depend on Kansas. They like to choke, so look for Piet to drop accordingly. | |||||||
| 3. Drum - best average seed, and Michigan St always seems to turn it up in the tournament. Could make a serious run. | |||||||
| 4. Derek - I like the Big X combo of Indiana/Wisconsin. Also, a third Big X team, Minnesota, could get D an upset or two. | |||||||
| 5. Brian H. - I have Duke as my national champion, so Brian will get some points. | |||||||
| 6. Brian T. - Brian did what he had to do with Louisville, but he just doesn't have much to back them up. | |||||||
| 7. Eric - relying on Gonzaga and St. Louis to carry him. Ugh. | |||||||
| 8. John - tough to draft 8th. Will probably finish 8th. John did make a very nice pick of Oregon, and will get a win in the Harvard/UNM game. | |||||||