Post Draft Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derek's Draft
Analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below are the estimated number of points and final ranking as
tallied from Nate Silver's round-specific probabilities of advancement for
each team. Note it is very close to the order of draft positions, for
whatever that is worth. As I recall, in the past positions 3-6 seem to be the
best, so this doesn't bode well for the system. Brian Taylor
is the projected winner of Hoops 2013. If I recall, he seems to do well
in my projections yet always loses miserably. Not surprising, my own ranking
methods rank me high at number 2 (again, I think this is constant across
years and I never seem to win - I think won in the second year we ever did
this pool, 1988...I feel like La Salle, so maybe this is my year to get back
on the winning track). Brian Hall will have to settle for a tie with Piet for
3rd this year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nate Silver Projections |
|
|
|
|
|
1st |
Brian T |
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
2nd |
Derek |
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
3rd |
Brian H |
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
4th |
Piet |
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
5th |
Eric |
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
6th |
Andrew |
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
7th |
Matt |
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
8th |
John |
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And for a team by team ranking of the value of each pick,
relative to the draft position they were takes, see below. This is also based
on the Nate Silver's probabilities. The Gain/Loss column tells you how many
points you gained or lost by taking that team relative to the draft position.
So it says that Andrew gained 1.19 points by picking Florida in the number 11
draft position (Silver's stats ranks Florida as the 3rd best pick on the
Tourney behind Louisville and Indiana. Florida was a much better value than
the number 2 value pick, Michigan by Piet, which was worth 0.47 points. The
worst pick relative to draft position is judged to be Duke by Brian Hall (the
reign of terror ends here!). Miami, UCLA & St. Louis are projected to be
pretty crappy picks too. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team |
Who |
Draft position |
Pick Value |
Draft Position Value |
Gain/Loss |
|
|
Florida |
AB |
11 |
3.052 |
1.866 |
1.186 |
|
|
Michigan |
PS |
14 |
2.044 |
1.572 |
0.472 |
|
|
Arizona |
AB |
22 |
1.393 |
1.022 |
0.371 |
|
|
Davidson |
DJ |
50 |
0.581 |
0.318 |
0.263 |
|
|
Minnesota |
DJ |
34 |
0.862 |
0.6 |
0.262 |
|
|
North
Carolina State |
BT |
32 |
1.014 |
0.783 |
0.231 |
|
|
Wisconsin |
DJ |
15 |
1.572 |
1.393 |
0.179 |
|
|
Bucknell |
ER |
44 |
0.59 |
0.415 |
0.175 |
|
|
Oklahoma |
AB |
43 |
0.6 |
0.431 |
0.169 |
|
|
New
Mexico State |
MD |
55 |
0.318 |
0.155 |
0.163 |
|
|
Wichita
State |
DJ |
47 |
0.512 |
0.359 |
0.153 |
|
|
Ohio
State |
MD |
7 |
2.555 |
2.418 |
0.137 |
|
|
Pittsburgh |
BH |
29 |
0.984 |
0.862 |
0.122 |
|
|
Akron |
BH |
52 |
0.359 |
0.251 |
0.108 |
|
|
California |
PS |
46 |
0.472 |
0.367 |
0.105 |
|
|
Missouri |
BT |
33 |
0.85 |
0.75 |
0.1 |
|
|
Valparaiso |
ER |
53 |
0.251 |
0.168 |
0.083 |
|
|
Oregon |
JH |
40 |
0.587 |
0.512 |
0.075 |
|
|
Marquette |
DJ |
18 |
1.356 |
1.305 |
0.051 |
|
|
UNLV |
ER |
21 |
1.142 |
1.093 |
0.049 |
|
|
Florida
Gulf Coast |
AB |
58 |
0.14 |
0.128 |
0.012 |
|
|
Cincinnati |
AB |
38 |
0.586 |
0.581 |
0.005 |
|
|
Syracuse |
BH |
13 |
1.73 |
1.725 |
0.005 |
|
|
Harvard |
JH |
56 |
0.155 |
0.151 |
0.004 |
|
|
La
Salle |
AB |
54 |
0.158 |
0.158 |
0 |
|
|
Louisville |
BT |
1 |
3.678 |
3.678 |
0 |
|
|
Indiana |
DJ |
2 |
3.556 |
3.556 |
0 |
|
|
Gonzaga |
ER |
5 |
2.788 |
2.788 |
0 |
|
|
Iona |
ER |
60 |
0.077 |
0.077 |
0 |
|
|
Michigan
State |
MD |
10 |
1.87 |
1.87 |
0 |
|
|
Pacific |
JH |
57 |
0.128 |
0.14 |
-0.012 |
|
|
James
Madison |
DJ |
63 |
0.009 |
0.021 |
-0.012 |
|
|
Creighton |
JH |
25 |
0.906 |
0.921 |
-0.015 |
|
|
North
Carolina A&T |
BT |
64 |
0.003 |
0.02 |
-0.017 |
|
|
Mississippi |
BH |
45 |
0.367 |
0.385 |
-0.018 |
|
|
Butler |
PS |
19 |
1.113 |
1.142 |
-0.029 |
|
|
Notre
Dame |
AB |
27 |
0.872 |
0.906 |
-0.034 |
|
|
Southern
University |
PS |
62 |
0.02 |
0.066 |
-0.046 |
|
|
Western
Kentucky |
BH |
61 |
0.021 |
0.072 |
-0.051 |
|
|
Colorado |
DJ |
31 |
0.75 |
0.802 |
-0.052 |
|
|
Iowa
State |
BH |
36 |
0.533 |
0.587 |
-0.054 |
|
|
Albany |
MD |
59 |
0.066 |
0.125 |
-0.059 |
|
|
Kansas
State |
BT |
16 |
1.305 |
1.364 |
-0.059 |
|
|
North
Carolina |
JH |
24 |
0.911 |
0.984 |
-0.073 |
|
|
Villanova |
MD |
42 |
0.385 |
0.47 |
-0.085 |
|
|
Illinois |
ER |
28 |
0.783 |
0.872 |
-0.089 |
|
|
Oklahoma
State |
BH |
20 |
1.022 |
1.113 |
-0.091 |
|
|
Memphis |
MD |
23 |
0.921 |
1.014 |
-0.093 |
|
|
Colorado
State |
MD |
39 |
0.431 |
0.533 |
-0.102 |
|
|
San
Diego State |
MD |
26 |
0.802 |
0.911 |
-0.109 |
|
|
Montana |
BT |
49 |
0.151 |
0.32 |
-0.169 |
|
|
Kansas |
PS |
3 |
2.881 |
3.052 |
-0.171 |
|
|
Belmont |
ER |
37 |
0.415 |
0.586 |
-0.171 |
|
|
Northwestern
State |
PS |
51 |
0.072 |
0.255 |
-0.183 |
|
|
Saint
Mary's |
JH |
41 |
0.255 |
0.472 |
-0.217 |
|
|
South
Dakota State |
BT |
48 |
0.125 |
0.35 |
-0.225 |
|
|
Georgetown |
JH |
8 |
1.866 |
2.114 |
-0.248 |
|
|
VCU |
BT |
17 |
1.093 |
1.356 |
-0.263 |
|
|
Temple |
PS |
35 |
0.32 |
0.59 |
-0.27 |
|
|
New
Mexico |
JH |
9 |
1.725 |
2.044 |
-0.319 |
|
|
Saint
Louis |
ER |
12 |
1.364 |
1.73 |
-0.366 |
|
|
UCLA |
PS |
30 |
0.47 |
0.85 |
-0.38 |
|
|
Miami
(FL) |
AB |
6 |
2.114 |
2.555 |
-0.441 |
|
|
Duke |
BH |
4 |
2.418 |
2.881 |
-0.463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew's Draft
Analysis |
|
|
The best average seed is Drum with a 7.88. John is worst
with a 9.00 average seed. The best among top four teams are Piet and
Eric with 4.25 average seeds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Andrew - With UF, Miami and Notre Dame, I will be
rooting for my team to lose. |
|
|
2. Piet - A good lineup, but his finish will depend on
Kansas. They like to choke, so look for Piet to drop accordingly. |
|
|
3. Drum - best average seed, and Michigan St always seems
to turn it up in the tournament. Could make a serious run. |
|
|
4. Derek - I like the Big X combo of
Indiana/Wisconsin. Also, a third Big X team, Minnesota, could get
D an upset or two. |
|
|
5. Brian H. - I have Duke as my national champion,
so Brian will get some points. |
|
|
6. Brian T. - Brian did what he had to do with Louisville,
but he just doesn't have much to back them up. |
|
|
7. Eric - relying on Gonzaga and St. Louis to carry
him. Ugh. |
|
|
8. John - tough to draft 8th. Will probably finish
8th. John did make a very nice pick of Oregon, and will get a win in
the Harvard/UNM game. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|